

I was reading a blog the other night about the political right and how it “hates” President Obama and his policies and as I read it the reality of one of the thought processes of the liberal minded is that they act in a bi-polar manner when discussing political issues.
What does that mean, you ask, well one of the aspects of a bi-polar nature is that there is no gray area in any discussion but rather there is “on” and “off”, “white and black” you get my drift. Now what I am talking about here is not the person writing the blog but rather the thought process that was put out in the article.
It is so easy to use the word “hate” to aid in a person’s rationalization of their position in any given matter because it shuts the door. Once hate is brought into a discussion regarding the disagreement of one position to another then the discussion stops. What the purveyor of this type of thinking is trying to do is stop discussion not maintain it in any manner of understanding. It is a sad position to take in that it hardens the debate process not allowing it to go forward. Maybe that is what the liberals truly want is no discussion only abject submission to the premise that their thinking is correct and all other thinking is wrong headed.
I do not hate Barak Obama as I hope that I hate no one. Hate is a terrible usurper of emotional goodwill in a person and allows for evil and non productive thought processes that drains me of positive feelings about myself and my fellow man.
I can honestly say that I highly disagree with the President’s positions in most matter (I supported the stimulus although it has been poorly managed and has not brought about the results that most Americans would like to see) but I supported it because I think the timing was right for it and it made sense to me. I believe in small government, Obama does not. I believe in an individual’s right to earn a living and to benefit from that work and not be forced to reallocate income to people that have no desire to work but rather live off the government dole. I believe in helping the down trodden and physically challenged in whatever way is possible that makes sense but I am against wealth redistribution to the masses that could care less where it is coming from or what if anything they have to do to earn it, if necessary.
I do not wish to wrap myself in a personal web of self knowledge and worth to the exclusion of those ideas that I need to hear even if I do not like the content or delivery of the words but I understand the importance in hearing the other side. Do I get riled, yes. Do I get challenged, yes but I always come away from it with something to think about and that is a learning process that I need in my life.
I think the word “hate” is over used and misunderstood in the context of politics. While I am sure that there are red necks in all parts of this country that would take a shot at the president, if they could, the masses that disagree are not bent to any type of violence in the settling of differences. Hate empowers bad acts of violence; just look at the local papers to get a fill of it but hate is NOT the fulcrum on which the political seesaw teeters on but rather agreement, disagreement and discernment weighed against the moral make up of the person judging the discussion.
If you like BIG government then you have to love Obama and if you don’t; you don’t have to hate him to disagree with him…you just have to disagree and I say there is nothing wrong with doing that as long as it is in an orderly and respectful manner. The Tea Parties were an example of citizens informing their government of their concerns. I didn’t see or hear of any violence, stores being looted any types of bad behavior during any of these rallies.
Actually, to the historian these were not much different than the colonist protesting King George’s taxes in colonial days but to paint them as “haters” allows the side that likes the current administration an easy way to forego any discussion regarding the motives of the protests.
I think there is middle ground that is no longer an easy place to get to anymore. I think the polarization of our society has gotten us to a place that few can look at the other side and find much agreement but I think we still must try to find that ground and if we do then hold it for all to speak and be heard whatever the issue. But there must be respect for all sides in a discussion and without it we can only expect what we currently have and it a poor substitute. Do I think it is possible, yes, but not probable with the current mindset of the American people. There is a schism that has been forming for years and if allowed to continue it will eventually destroy us. I hope and pray that we do not meet this end.